|
Washington Mutual Receives a 2 out of 5
star Rating from Epinions
Ratings and Reviews.
Washington Mutual Receives a 3 out of 5
point Rating from JD Poewrs 2005
Mortgage Report.
The Following 133 Complaints have been
issue against Washington Mutual at the Bad
Business Bureau".
Date Use
your back arrow when clicking on links
to return to this page.
1. 7/13/2005
3:17:16 PM


2. 7/12/2005
11:28:07 PM



3. 7/11/2005
3:06:00 PM

4. 7/10/2005
2:54:00 AM

5. 7/3/2005
3:51:00 PM
6. 6/15/2005
3:11:00 AM
7. 6/14/2005
4:53:00 PM
8. 6/1/2005
9:10:43 AM

9. 5/31/2005
1:04:57 PM

10. 4/23/2005
4:36:00 PM
11. 4/16/2005
11:27:41 AM

12. 4/15/2005
6:02:00 PM
13. 4/14/2005
6:45:00 AM
14. 2/24/2005
1:35:02 PM

15. 2/23/2005
5:37:00 AM

Date
16. 2/20/2005
12:19:00 PM
17. 2/4/2005
10:48:51 PM

18. 2/1/2005
3:37:35 PM

19. 1/18/2005
11:50:37 PM

20. 1/8/2005
4:53:00 PM
21. 1/6/2005
8:32:00 AM
22. 12/14/2004
11:35:00 PM
23. 12/7/2004
5:50:00 AM
24. 12/6/2004
10:39:00 AM
25. 12/3/2004
12:13:00 PM
26. 11/30/2004
2:50:00 PM
|
Washington Mutual, Long Beach
Mortgage, Ocwen, Countrywide,
And Calmco, Olympus, Fairbanks
ripoff fraud embezzelment
extortion misappropriation of
funds, forgery theft Nationwide |
Loans: Washington
Mutual, LBM, Ocwen, Countrywide,
Calmco, Olympus, Fairbanks
Nationwide |
 |
Author: Ben
Lomond, California |
27. 11/24/2004
12:12:00 AM
28. 11/18/2004
11:11:00 AM
29. 11/17/2004
4:57:00 PM
30. 11/9/2004
6:40:14 AM

Date
31. 11/1/2004
8:44:00 AM
32. 10/28/2004
2:43:03 PM

33. 10/24/2004
9:17:58 PM

34. 10/8/2004
2:01:38 PM

35. 10/4/2004
2:46:00 PM
36. 10/1/2004
9:57:44 PM

37. 9/18/2004
12:05:00 PM
38. 9/16/2004
7:51:00 PM
39. 9/10/2004
6:47:42 PM

40. 9/7/2004
3:21:00 PM
41. 9/4/2004
6:32:52 PM

42. 9/3/2004
8:16:00 PM
43. 8/28/2004
11:07:00 AM
44. 8/13/2004
3:19:00 PM
45. 8/4/2004
7:08:00 PM
Date
46. 7/7/2004
2:41:00 PM
47. 7/6/2004
11:27:44 PM

48. 6/19/2004
12:21:16 AM

49. 6/14/2004
11:44:00 AM
50. 6/10/2004
7:03:00 PM
51. 6/4/2004
1:30:00 AM
52. 5/25/2004
11:43:00 PM
53. 5/24/2004
6:09:00 PM
54. 5/14/2004
8:37:00 PM
55. 5/11/2004
11:00:00 PM
56. 4/28/2004
4:58:00 PM
57. 4/21/2004
11:49:13 PM

58. 4/19/2004
9:19:00 AM
59. 4/16/2004
8:07:55 PM

60. 4/15/2004
11:00:37 PM

Date
61. 4/15/2004
5:07:23 PM


62. 3/31/2004
11:24:55 PM


63. 3/28/2004
6:55:00 PM
64. 3/24/2004
6:30:00 PM
65. 3/23/2004
10:37:00 PM
66. 3/21/2004
3:01:00 PM
67. 3/19/2004
6:36:00 PM
68. 3/16/2004
3:34:00 PM
69. 3/1/2004
6:56:00 PM
70. 2/25/2004
4:27:00 PM
71. 2/24/2004
3:26:00 PM
72. 2/10/2004
1:01:00 PM
73. 2/8/2004
8:12:00 PM
74. 12/28/2003
9:01:00 PM
75. 12/27/2003
11:12:25 PM

Date
76. 12/12/2003
7:31:00 AM
77. 11/30/2003
7:26:09 PM

78. 11/14/2003
2:39:00 PM
79. 11/13/2003
8:33:35 PM

80. 11/10/2003
5:09:00 PM
81. 11/10/2003
3:51:00 PM
82. 10/30/2003
9:37:00 PM
83. 10/30/2003
7:01:00 AM
84. 10/25/2003
4:27:00 AM
85. 10/13/2003
8:25:00 AM
86. 9/29/2003
2:10:31 PM

87. 9/11/2003
11:59:14 PM

88. 7/15/2003
9:16:14 AM
89. 6/22/2003
10:15:55 PM

90. 6/18/2003
3:30:14 PM
Date
91. 6/15/2003
11:47:33 PM

92. 6/11/2003
8:34:21 AM
93. 6/11/2003
8:23:07 AM
94. 6/9/2003
2:07:26 PM
95. 6/6/2003
9:02:11 PM
96. 6/6/2003
12:33:02 PM
97. 6/5/2003
10:30:56 PM
98. 5/19/2003
5:25:49 PM
99. 4/30/2003
12:50:10 PM
100. 4/24/2003
10:40:35 PM
101. 4/22/2003
11:06:16 PM

102. 4/20/2003
11:26:14 PM

103. 4/13/2003
8:43:52 PM
104. 4/3/2003
12:54:01 PM
105. 3/17/2003
7:56:16 AM
Date
106. 3/13/2003
4:08:23 PM
107. 3/7/2003
2:30:17 AM

108. 2/25/2003
4:04:40 PM
109. 2/21/2003
11:14:53 PM


110. 2/21/2003
11:12:46 PM

111. 2/10/2003
1:16:07 AM

112. 1/15/2003
10:58:30 PM

113. 1/8/2003
4:10:40 PM
114. 1/3/2003
1:02:47 AM

115. 12/10/2002
8:30:23 PM

116. 9/19/2002
10:24:38 AM
117. 9/9/2002
8:32:23 PM


118. 8/31/2002
7:32:22 PM
119. 7/16/2002
3:00:42 PM
120. 7/3/2002
9:21:30 AM
Date
121. 5/22/2002

122. 5/4/2002

123. 4/27/2002
3:50:33 PM
124. 4/27/2002

125. 2/9/2002
126. 1/31/2002
127. 11/26/2001

128. 11/26/2001
 |
Washington Mutual Bank
|
Overall rating: 
Reviewed by 19 Epinions users - Write a review |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
|
| |
|
wamu
home
loan,
wamu
home
loans,
WaMuHomeLoan,
WaMuHomeLoan.com,
WaMuHomeLoans,
WaMuHomeLoans.com,
washington
mutual
home
loan,
Washington
Mutual
Home
Loans,
washington
mutual
home
mortgages,
washington
mutual
mortgages,
WashingtonMutualHomeLoan,
washingtonmutualhomeloan.com,
washingtonmutualhomeloans,
WashingtonMutualHomeLoans.com
| Read Reviews |
 |
|
Sort by
Product Rating |
Sort by
Review Date |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual Bank - They Understand The Meaning Behind Customer Service
by kristinafh in Personal Finance, Sep 15 '03
Pros: Processes my payments in a timely manner. Treats you like you matter.
Cons: Charge for making payment over the phone.
About four months ago, we refinanced our mortgage and went with Cendant. Prior to that, our mortgage was bought and sold four times (in seven years!) and Washington Mutual was one of the servicers that we had the opportunity to work with. Washington Mutual actually held on to our mortgage for over two years - close to the longest period of time that any other entity had it. They probably would have seen it through the life of the loan had I not refinanced through a different company.
Let's start with some basic things that you care about with a servicer.
First, their monthly statements that were mailed were SO easy to read. You never had a doubt on what your principle was, how much you owed on a monthly basis, what your interest rate was, how much you had in escrow, how your payments were applied to the various categories, or who to contact if you had a question. Their statements, which you could also access online via their website, were very easy on the eyes. Lots of good white space. Lots of good colors to draw attention to the important areas.
Second, I could pay my mortgage payment in a couple of different ways. There was the usual snail mail method, through my bill payer, through their deduction service, or I could call on the phone and arrange for the payment to be deducted from my checking account immediately. The really nice thing about this last option is that it is totally computer driven and I would never have to interact with a human being. Not that I don't like interacting with human beings...just sometimes, it's nice to be taken through a menu-driven computer bot payment service.
There is a charge though, for this service. At the time that I used it, it was $17.00. Convenience has a price people :).
Third, my payments were processed in a very timely manner. Unlike the excuses that I have received before from credit card processors, Washington Mutual seemed to post my payments quicker than any other entity I've dealt with before.
And finally, in the two year period that I had to deal with Washington Mutual, I found them to be really wonderful. I utilized multiple ways to interact with them - through their website, the telephone, and snail mail. They always treated me as though my miniscule mortgage mattered and that as a customer, my happiness was part of the bigger picture.
So anything negative to report? Well, the only thing that I would have liked was having the ability to pay for my mortgage online, through their website. I'm sure that in time, that's coming. :)
With mortgage rates available at levels not seen in decades, my wife and were among the millions of homeowners who recently refinanced their mortgage. Economic experts from Alan Greenspan to executives at private lenders credited the refinance boom with cushioning the recession. And lenders were busy.
After shopping around and working with a broker, my wife and I found a terrific rate at Washington Mutual that we didn’t even have to bother locking in. The lender had us close with no points in just two weeks.
In addition to 15 and 30 year fixed rate mortgages, Washington Mutual offers a traditional adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) for one, three or five years and an option ARM that pays off interest only and is best suited for those trying to squeeze the most house they can buy from their monthly payment. Being plain Jane vanilla types, we opted for a 30 year fixed mortgage and use our evolving financial status to decide how often to pay additional funds towards the principal.
Closing was a snap, and while there were some junk fees buried in the paperwork, those were driven by the settlement company, not WAMU.
Switching Over
In these days of electronic bill presentment and funds transfer, one shouldn’t have to worry about a coupon book arriving on time or using temporary invoices to pay the note. We didn’t. Our paperwork arrived in less than two weeks and was clear, concise and easy to understand. Within minutes we had transferred the old balance from Quicken, chuckled at the lower rate and set up a new scheduled transaction.
No More Coupons!
Welcome to the web. Carefully (more about that later) enter a password and the world is at your fingertips.
Perhaps Washington Mutual Mortgage’s best feature besides the fast turnaround in receiving our paperwork is the lender’s online section called My Home Loan. Setting up your account only requires the loan number, your social security number and an email address. Be careful though – the password is 6 digits, not at least 6 digits, and it’s case sensitive. Web denizens who fly through account setups would be well advised to take their time on this one. Fortunately, the site also offers the ability to choose a secret question and answer to reset your password on the fly.
Once you’re logged in, you’ll be able to check any bit of information you could conceivably think of regarding your mortgage. Everything from escrow balances and payoff information to your next payment information is available with a single click on the user friendly menu. You can even order copies of loan documents. According to the site, you’ll soon be able to view and print an IRS form 1098 (needed to deduct interest) right off the site.
Also dotting the site are various calculators and add-on products. As with any mortgage lender, don’t take the “how much house you can afford” at face value because they all yield notoriously high values. There are plenty of great books and reference sources that can help you calculate this number.
Customer Service
We’ve only had to place one call, but the phone was answered promptly and the customer service representative was very helpful. No complaints here.
The Bottom Line
Big banks and lenders take a lot of customer abuse for seeming cold and impersonal. Some is probably warranted. But Washington Mutual has been nothing but a joy to deal with since we started with them. If their bank branches were more convenient, I would seriously consider opening an account.
Five Things To Remember From This Review
1. There are a lot of options to choose from, but the site does a fairly good job explaining them. Read between the lines if you’re not choosing a standard mortgage.
2. Customer Service and fulfillment were lightning fast.
3. The web site is as comprehensive as any financial web site could be.
4. You can order documents and soon will be able to print IRS documents directly from the site.
5. Paying electronically is a breeze through major financial institutions and lets you hold on to those funds just a few extra days longer.
Joubert’s Fun Link
Of the financial supersites, I think SmartMoney.com offers the best advice – especially for those who may not be comfortable dealing with financial issues. Hint: skip the “Mortgage Expo” section at the top of this page and dive straight into the meaty articles and worksheets.
http://www.smartmoney.com/home/
©2003 Joubert
Recommended
Yes
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Still Thinking About Refinancing Your Mortgage? Consider Washington Mutual
by Joubert, Jan 15 '03
Pros: Great website, fast customer service...
Cons: ...make dealing with a big bank a breeze. No problems yet!
With mortgage rates available at levels not seen in decades, my wife and were among the millions of homeowners who recently refinanced their mortgage. Economic experts from Alan Greenspan to executives at private lenders credited the refinance boom with...
Read the full review |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK - Ditched Bank Of America To Come Back
by spongebob_man1, Feb 07 '04
Pros: Excellent Customer Service, Truly Free Checking, No Charge ATMs For Everyone
Cons: No Picture Debit Cards
I have banked with Washington Mutual (WM) for about 6 consecutive years. During my short, and drama filled, stint at Bank Of America (aka - Satan's Bank) I maintained my WM accounts. "Maintained?" Basically, I did nothing. I only had $3.76 in my checking ...
Read the full review
wamu home loan, wamu home loans, WaMuHomeLoan, WaMuHomeLoan.com, WaMuHomeLoans, WaMuHomeLoans.com, washington mutual home loan, Washington Mutual Home Loans, washington mutual home mortgages, washington mutual mortgages, WashingtonMutualHomeLoan, washingtonmutualhomeloan.com, washingtonmutualhomeloans, WashingtonMutualHomeLoans.com |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual Bank: The WORST Bank EVER!!!
by Candice923, Aug 22 '03
Pros: Free Checking, good website, lots of locations
Cons: HORRIBLE customer service, hidden fees EVERYWHERE
Okay, maybe I should stop writing reviews when I'm royally ticked off. Then again, this is when you ...
Washington Mutual Bank: The WORST Bank EVER!!!
Aug 22 '03
Author's Product Rating

| Customer Service: |
 |
|
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
|
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Pros
Free Checking, good website, lots of locations
Cons
HORRIBLE customer service, hidden fees EVERYWHERE
The Bottom Line
Free checking? Definitely not worth the aggravation.
wamu home loan, wamu home loans, WaMuHomeLoan, WaMuHomeLoan.com, WaMuHomeLoans, WaMuHomeLoans.com, washington mutual home loan, Washington Mutual Home Loans, washington mutual home mortgages, washington mutual mortgages, WashingtonMutualHomeLoan, washingtonmutualhomeloan.com, washingtonmutualhomeloans, WashingtonMutualHomeLoans.com
|
| Full Review |
Okay, maybe I should stop writing reviews when I'm royally ticked off. Then again, this is when you, my faithful readers, are able to see my raw and true emotions.
Right now my raw and true emotions about Washington Mutual is: I HATE THIS FRICKIN' BANK!!!
Seriously, they are SO much more of a headache than they are worth. The poor customer service is exactly why their checking accounts are free. NO ONE WANTS TO BANK THERE!!! The free checking accounts are just a ploy to obtain public notice, then charge you up the wazoo for things you didn't even know that you could be charged for.
I joined Washington Mutual when I first moved to Los Angeles in 2001. The reason was because there are so many different branches around. There are also a lot of billboards boasting their free checking. Hey, I didn't have a lot of money, and free checking sure was appealing to me. So I signed up.
A few months later, I was able to add my husband- not even a U.S. resident with a Social Security Number - onto the account. I suppose that should have sent up some red flags. But, I was just thrilled that Jared and I had a bank account together. Unfortunately, that was the beginning of the end.
Since Jared and I started our account together, we have had nothing but problems with Washington Mutual. We have had to close three different accounts and open new ones. One reason was because some company took $1400 out of our bank account, and Washington Mutual never paid the money back to us. We never authorized the charges. NEVER. Did Washington Mutual care? No. The money was gone, and never going to come back. There wasn't a darned thing that Jared and I could do about it, either. Needless to say, the security with Washington Mutualstinks. What ever happened to fraud protection and customer care?
There is so much miscommunication with Washington Mutual and its customers, it is ridiculous. For example, I just deposited a check for a little over $35,000 into our account. When I deposited this money, I was told that $5,000 would be released immediately, and the remainder would be released on 8/16. I wrote out a bunch of checks, which did NOT total the $5,000 and the money that I had in there previously. Guess what? Washington Mutual decided to release to me only $2,500 and NOT TELL ME ABOUT IT. So, these checks bounced. It is the first time that I have ever bounced checks, and I am mortified. I mean, really. Plus, I was charged $21 for each of the four checks that bounced. Julie even said to me, "Well, you've got plenty of money in your account. I don't see why you should worry." The nerve!
So, I called Washington Mutual to take care of it. I spoke with Julie, a supervisor, who said that she would get back to me by the close of business that day. Of course, that was three days ago, and I never heard from her. Today, I calledWashington Mutual again, and spoke with a new supervisor, Kelly. Kelly pulled up my record and saw that Julie wrote that she was going to call me back, but she never did. So, Kelly apologized for Julie and gave me $63 back into my account. Of course, I'm still going to get hit with the fees from the companies that I wrote the checks to. Terrific.
This isn't the first time that Washington Mutual has held funds from me and not told me about it. As a matter of fact, it has happened on several occasions. And, quite frankly, I'm getting very sick of it. As if I don't have enough on my plate to worry about my banking.
In my humble opinion, banking is supposed to be easy and convenient. Most important, I believe that a person's money should be accessible to them at any time, and they shouldn't have to worry about it. Banks should keep the money of their customers safe. Period.
And the "free checking" Washington Mutual offers isn't so free. You get free checks, which is nice. But, the names on my checks were spelled wrong FOUR different times. I wound up going to Checks Unlimited to purchase my checks because our names were spelled wrong. Our address was even wrong. Plus, the fees they hit you with for ATM usage is ridiculous. Every month, I have at least a $10 fee for domestic ATM use. to be honest, I don't use any other ATMs besidesWashington Mutual! It is SO frustrating. I don't know where these charges are coming from. Plus the $21 they hit me with every now and again for "returned items" even though I've got plenty of money in my bank account as well as a $1,000 overdraft limit.
Customer service leaves much to be desired. Sure, the people at the bank are terrific, but most have no idea as to what they are doing. They tell me one thing and the people at the "Customer Service" Center tell me something entirely different. The right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing!
Here is another case of miscommunication and customer dissatisfaction. My mother cosigned on my house. She was refinancing her house and needed proof that I was paying my mortgage by myself. I needed copies of the checks that I wrote toWashington Mutual for my homeloan. (They bought out Homeside Lending, who had my original loan.) First of all, they topped sending my my canceled checks, for some strange reason. Seriously, they just stopped coming. Why? I found out later that someone "accidentally" chose that I don't receive these checks when I opened a new account. Ridiculous. Anyway, I was told that they would fax the checks that I needed to the Washington Mutual branch that I go to right by my house, and I should go there at 4:00 and pick them up. So, at 4:00, I headed over toWashington Mutual to pick up the fax. Karen, the branch manager there (whom I love), told me that no faxes had come in for me. She went to check the fax machine. Guess what? It was broken. So, they fixed it and about 200 pages came out. And not one was for me. By this time, it is 4:45, and I call the Customer Care Center to speak with Gail, the woman that was supposedly faxing me the checks. She insisted that they were sent and asked to speak with Karen. Karen got on the phone and told her that they didn't arrive. They spoke for a little, then Karen's eyes got wide. After Karen hung up, she told me that they accidentally faxed my canceled checks to another bank-- In Chino, CA. Gail actually asked Karen if I could drive to Chino (over an hour) to pick them up.
Of course, I called Gail and explained to her how far Chino was. Since it was after 5:00, they couldn't fax the checks. I had to come back at 11am the following day. So, I go there the following day and -- guess what? -- no checks. I get on the phone with Gail once again, and she informs me that they lost the fax number for the branch, and they were waiting for my call to give it to them.
At 5:00 that night, the fax FINALLY comes through. And, it is completely illegible. It's black in some places and completely unreadable in others. I was MIFFED.
We finally got this entire fiasco taken care of the following day, and mom got to refinance her house. But, Jared (my husband) and I were really put out by this entire situation. That was a few months ago. We should have switched banks then. Oh, well. Hindsight is 20/20.
When the Washington Mutual website is up and running, it is pretty good. There is a lot of information about their services, and you can access all of your accounts. But, the server is constantly down. (Don't worry-- I'll write a review about this at some point in the category for it.)
Do yourself a favor when you are looking for a bank: Avoid Washington Mutual at all costs.
Recommended
No
|
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Froze 3 times by mistake- won't release funds-Updated 8/13/03
by relyon, Aug 10 '03
Pros: "Free" checking has cost us hundreds of $$$$
Cons: "Free" checking has cost us hundreds of $$$$
Imagine you had just deposited $4000 into you checking account, to add to your existing balance of $ ...
Froze 3 times by mistake- won't release funds-Updated 8/13/03
Aug 10 '03 (Updated Aug 18 '03)
Author's Product Rating

| Customer Service: |
 |
|
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
|
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Pros
"Free" checking has cost us hundreds of $$$$
Cons
"Free" checking has cost us hundreds of $$$$
The Bottom Line
Stay AWAY!!!! Closed account by mistake, 2 weeks later WMU still has our money
|
| Full Review |
Imagine you had just deposited $4000 into you checking account, to add to your existing balance of $1500, and the next day you write checks for $3500, and then a week later you get a letter informing you you account has been closed (by mistake) four business days ago(6 real days ago)and any checks you had outstanding would be (by that time already had been )returned "Account Closed",and since the checks had been returned "Accout Closed", they were automatically sent to Telecheck and also the District Attorney for possible criminal charges.
Now imagine the bank does it 3 times!!!!!!!! In less than 2 months!!!!!
Except the last time it happened, your account could not be reopened, and the bank said they would send you a check for your $5,500 balance "sometime" but didn't know when, and two weeks later you still hadn't received it, then you discover they never sent it!!!
Welcome to Washington Mutual Bank's commitment to customer disservice and our story.
Our story....
We opened our joint account in mid May '03 after closing my wife's account she'd had there since back when they were Bank United ("Honey, it's free and I've been a customer there for years, why keep paying Bank of America $$$ each month if you don't need to?").
One of our business checks we had deposited into our account bounced because we had made a math error of about $20 (part of the learning curve of having joint accounts).
While 3 states away, we discovered it had bounced while on line the Friday it had been bounced. We immediately called and were informed to mail funds to them ASAP and everything would be OK as long as they got the funds and the check cleared the bank, people make mistakes sometimes, but don't make any more. From then on, we only deposited cash and never had another overdraft.
We mailed them the funds (they had no branches in the state we were in) next business day, Monday, and was deposited into our account to cover the check on Wed. We admit we made a mistake, but who hasn't at least once? So we had mailed them funds to cover our mistake before they even mailed us a letter informing us of the overdraft.
When we got back home two weeks later, we received a letter telling us they had frozen the account four days before, and it would be closed in 2 weeks. We called them, faxed them the requested proof the replacement funds had cleared, and they reactivated our account, reversed the pending closure, and we went to our branch and ordered new check cards.
Then two weeks later, we get a letter informing us again us they had frozen the account four days before and it would be closed in 2 weeks. When we called they said it was an error, they were sorry, our account was actually in good standing and they would reimburse us for any overdraft charges from the checks returned while our account had been frozen, they would send us a letter to explain their mistake, reactivated our account, reversed the pending closure, and we went to our branch to order new check cards again.
Then, again, two weeks later, all of sudden our check cards wouldn't work. We called and were told it must be some mistake, our account was indeed open and in good standing, and there was NO REASON for our cards to be inactivated and go to our branch to have our cards reactivated.
So we go to our branch the next day at 3pm to make a deposit and reactivate our cards and we're informed our account is closed. After several phone calls to WMU headquarters to several stupidvisors, no one anywhere with WMU could explain why our account was closed.
Finally at 6:30, after waiting 3 1/2 hours in their lobby, we were informed that while the original, and second, decision to reverse the inactivation and closing of our accounts had been made, the original decision to close our account had not been cancelled and was therfore closing our account was a valid closure, albeit a month after it's original closure date, and that keeping our account open an extra month had been a mistake(which makes no sense to me).
Which meant that ALL of our funds in our account were withdrawn by WMU and we would be sent a check, and the 5 checks we had written which were outstanding would be returned as account closed, and any returned check fees assessed us was our problem to deal with. (5 X $25 = $125)
When asked when our check would be sent, no one could answer, and when we called 7 days later, no one could tell us if or when the check had been sent, but when we spke to the stupidvisor's stupidvisor, she informed us she personally would call us with that info in a couple of hours.
That was last week and we still haven't heard from her, or anyone, or received a check. It doesn't seem to matter we need our funds to do things like pay our mortgage, car notes, insurance, credit cards, and other what must seem to WMU be non-essential bills.
Or that the businesses we had written checks to that bounced because they had suddenly closed our account have now sent the returned checks to the District attorney for criminal charges because we haven't reimbursed them because WMU still has our funds which were much, much more sufficient to cover our checks when we wrote them. So now we have potential legal fees we may incur because of WMU's mistake.
But we are much relieved to have received two letters apologizing for their mistake, but still no check.
In sum, we make a mistake and the next business day we mail them the funds to cover our mistake. They make several mistakes resulting in our having several of our checks returned and all the headches associated with having checks returned, all thru no fault of our own, then they take our money, and two weeks later we still haven't seen our money, can't pay our bills, have spent about 24 man hours of our time and will have to spend $125 in overdraft fees, but we do have a couple of nice letters of apology from WMU, and they were nice enough to tell us we could open a new account with WMU anytime since we were in such good standing with them.
Needless to say, we are not stupid, we opened an account elswhere. And if we ever get our money from them, we'll deposit it in our new account.
Update:
After several more phone calls (ie: Tell us what happened, put on hold, let me get a stupidvisor, tell me what happened, put on hold, we'll call you back, but they don't)
we finaly discovered they had NEVER mailed us our fund.
Although they had originally told us that even though they had closed our account by mistake, there was NO WAY they could reopen it so our wrtitten checks could clear or we could withdraw our money, NOW they would reopen our account, put the money back into it so we could go down and withdraw it, then close it, and they would call us in a couple of hours to confirm, but they never called.
The afternoon of the next day, we called them (ie: Tell us what happened, put on hold, let me get a stupidvisor, tell me what happened, put on hold again, but this time they actually had an answer!!!!).
Sure enough, they were sorry they hadn't called us but they had put our money into our temporily open account. So we made a beeline to the bank and got our money.
However, since our outstanding checks had been returned "Account Closed" before we knew any of this was going on, several of the businesses we had written checks to automatically placed them into their "FRAUD" file, reported it to Telecheck and the District Attorney. Any fees involved were our responsibility because we are being held responsible for the WMU's mistake. WMU say's they're truly sorry, but the fees are our problem to deal with.
Thanks WMU!!!!
Recommended
No
|
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
False advertising
by thecathy, Jun 02 '03
Pros: Online information available on process from A-Z
Cons: Online potential not used, poor customer service, communicate poorly
My husband and I wanted to take advantage of the low rates in the economy and lock in at a lower fixed rate on our mortgage. In December I started doing research on rates to find the best deal available. Not wanting to pay broker fees (the upfront cost often takes a few years to recoup in actual dollar savings) and knowing some of what was available from working in the industry, I wanted to start with the major players in the mortgage industry. Of those, Washington Mutual was boasting the best rates on the product we wanted: 30 year fixed rate mortgage.
They warned of a longer than average time to close because of the large number of clients they were servicing. This didn't surprise me because I had done the research and every one should be applying with them; they offered the best rates.
Not only did they have the best rates, but their website (where I prefer to do most of my personal research) was exquisite. It promised to keep track of your loan process from application to close by date stamping each task completed by the Washington Mutual staff. You could email your loan processor directly for status at any time by simply clicking below their picture. Most lenders won't follow up with you regarding each step; you'll need to contact them to find out what is going on. This was a definite selling point: perhaps they did have more "human interest" as their commercials boast.
Even my first telephone contact with them seemed promising. The representative seemed to care about what our goals were and wanted to be upfront about the expected process. She even added to the experience by dropping the rate even more than the posted rate because of our credit ratings. This ended by pleasant experience with Washington Mutual.
Our estimated closing date (after my conversation with the representative) was 60 days. We weren't going to provide income documentation (because of our credit ratings which were already checked) so we could speed the process from their 90 day disclaimer. 60 days later they had done nothing online and a phone conversation confirmed the same. Although a less than competent appraiser had made it seem crucial that he see our home (for 30 seconds) to prepare his $375 report for them. He didn't have the right age of our home, number of rooms, square footage, or comparable sales. (I'm certified as an appraiser and know his skills and professionalism were less than par.)
Washington Mutual had yet to transfer our file for processing (analyzing for approval). I complained by email (the link online didn't work by the way; only an empty screen came up) and received a call 2 days later from our processor. Two weeks later after another email complaint on my part, I got a call from a woman asking what type of loan we were looking for and saying we would need income documentation because we didn't qualify for the product we wanted. Our credit scores didn't meet guidelines. I was furious. Two and half months later and they had done nothing on my loan and had actually taken 5 steps backwards. I had to re-explain what we were trying to do (reduce our interest rate). I had wasted this much time and at least still had a lock on my interest rate, so we submitted our documents.
A week later after another complaint email, I received a call saying our taxes didn't verify enough income because they could only consider a portion of our tax return. That's ridiculous. The IRS considers the entire thing. They wouldn't. He said we could refinance to an adjustable rate mortgage, but not a fixed rate. Why would I refinance to a variable rate when we have a fixed rate right now? Why would I have waited three months to refinance when I could have converted to variable rate with my current lender in two weeks? He had no answers for me so I spoke with his supervisor.
She disagreed with him regarding what minimum credit scores were for fixed rate products and confirmed they wouldn't consider a large portion of our annual income from 2 years tax returns. I explained that I was more than disappointed with their service and suggested that they figure out a way to communicate among their ranks what exactly they could and couldn't do so their customers might better know what to expect.
I followed this up with an email suggesting the same and explained that I would be embarrassed if my own staff were this incompetent. They sent a generic "we care" email back and asked that I call and explain what happened. I JUST DID! I had sent them an extensive email with names, dates, and continued disappointments.
Recommended
No
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual Mortgage - fraud, lies, incompetence
by surfer60, Feb 10 '04
Pros: 0
Cons: Washington Mutual screwed-up escrow, forced flood insurance, fraudulent accounting, dishonest customer service
Washington Mutual needs to be held accountable and punished severely. My total loss so far is $469.68 plus countless hours on the phone, faxing documents and e-mailing information.
1. Miss-management of home mortgage escrow account. In 2002 I received notice from Washington Mutual that there was a shortage in my escrow account. After I researched the transaction history I found that Washington Mutual paid my home owner’s insurance twice by mistake. Three months of phone calls to the Washington Mutual customer service line were required before they fixed their mistake. Countless hours wasted.
2. Forced Flood Insurance. On May 30 I received a letter from Washington Mutual that my home requires flood insurance and if I didn’t provide proof of insurance within 45 days (7/14/03) they would place (force) insurance. I called Wamu Customer service, talked to Tiffany, and explained that my home is not in “flood zone AE” and I have “Flood Letter Certification” stating that my property is in Zone C. Tiffany told me to fax the letter to Attn.: Insurance Dept at 843-413-2000 and include my loan number, which I did. I received another “Notice of Flood Insurance Requirement”. I called Customer service again and talked to Dan. He said that they received the fax but did not complete the work order to stop the forced insurance. Dan assured me that I will not receive any more”Flood Insurance Requirement” letters. On July 5th I received a “Second Notice of Flood Insurance Requirement” letter dated July 1. This letter states that if I do not respond in 15 days (7/16/03) flood insurance will be obtained at my expense at a cost of $1,315.88 per year. I checked with the Better Business Bureau and found a fax number for Lisa Marita Executive Liaison. I faxed the information to Lisa Morita, Al Turbeville and Rob Sawall. All assured me that this problem has been taken care of and there would be no forced flood insurance. On Aug. 21 the amount of $1,315.88 was taken from my escrow to pay for flood insurance and the coverage started 5/26/03 (50 days earlier than what was stated in the May 30 letter). On Aug. 22 I refinanced my mortgage with my local credit union, no flood insurance needed. I faxed Wamu insurance dept. told them to contact the flood insurance company and wave the flood insurance. Wamu didn’t contact the insurance until 9/2/03 and they gave the insurance company a cancellation date of 9/2/03 instead of waving the insurance. $355.78 lost.
3. Lies, lies, and more lies. On Sept. 12 the flood insurance company mailed a $960.10 refund check to Wamu ($1,315.88 – $355.78 "99 days of coverage 5/26/03 to 9/2/03" = $960.10). On Oct. 15 Wamu mailed a $846.20 check to me ($113.90 short). Below is the e-mail communication that I have had with Tracie, a Washington Mutual eCare specialist from Jan. 29 through Feb. 6. Note, please scroll to the bottom to read in chronological order:
2/6/04
Tracie,
Nice try.
I have a copy of the letter sent from Yolanda Glass of Washington Mutual to the title company dated 8/29/03 stating "Your check in the amount of $98,584.91 was received." Also, I have a copy of the FedEx shipping label (TRK # 7908 8222 7788) with proof that the $98,584.91 check was delivered to Washington Mutual Payoff Unit on 8/28/03.
Now before you try to tell me that the $88.90 in interest is because the $1,112.39 wasn't received until 9/3/03, Yolanda's letter also states "The signature on this guarantee letter will ensure the payoff of this loan and will keep interest from accruing... Washington Mutual will stop further interest from accruing on the loan... If funds are not received at Washington Mutual by 9/3/03 we understand that the loan will be reactivated." I also have a copy of the FedEx shipping label (TRK # 7923 1948 1711) with proof that the $1,112.39 check was received at the Washington Mutual payoff Unit on 9/3/03, and the transaction history shows payment received in the amount of $999.99 + $112.40 = $1,112.39 on 9/3/03.
Send a check to me in the amount of $113.90.
I am following through with what I stated in my 2/5/03 email to you:
"If your next email does not satisfy my request I will file a complaint with the Attorney General, the OBRE, www.ripoffreport.com, etc. The complaint will include how Washington Mutual miss-managed my escrow account in 2002, falsely forced flood insurance in 2003, added bogus fees to the closing/payoff amount and failed miserably at "customer service".
The above reports will be mailed Monday, 2/9/03. I suggest you satisfy my request no later than noon Monday.
M
________________________________________________________________________
From: "WaMuLoanService.com"
Reply-To: "WaMuLoanService.com"
To: M
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Escrow / Taxes / Insurance
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:22:08 -0800
Dear M,
Thank you for your inquiry about your Washington Mutual home loan.
When a loan is being paid in full, interest accrues daily. The interest due on 09/02/03 was $632.36. The amount received to be applied as interest was $543.46 (good through 08/28/03). The difference of $88.90 was applied as interest.
It is our goal to provide you with the best customer service possible.
If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding your home loan, please contact us again by email or contact our Customer Care Department toll-free at 1-866-WAMU-YES. Our home loan professionals are available to respond to you 24 hours a day, except for major holidays.
Thank You,
Tracie
eCare Specialist
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
_______________________________________________
Tracie,
I have a copy of the Washington Mutual Demand/Payoff Statement dated 8/20/2003. This statement itemizes the following:
Current total unpaid principal balance - $97,956.45
Interest to 8/28/2003 - $543.46
Payoff statement fee - $60.00
Recording Fee - $25.00
Total amount due to Washington Mutual - $98,584.91
In your email you said "On 09/02/03, Washington Mutual received funds in the amount of $98,584.91. $25.00 of this was immediately applied as the recording fee, leaving a remainder of $98,559.91 (the $60.00 payoff statement fee was not taken from this amount)."
If the $60.00 payoff statement fee was not taken from the "remainder of $98,559.91" then where did the extra $60.00 go? It wasn't the principal balance ($97,956.45) because I verified the principal balance amount with the transaction history. It wasn't the interest ($543.46) because again I verified the amount with Washington Mutual records. The Washington Mutual Demand/Payoff Statement dated 8/20/2003 along with the transaction history is proof that the $60.00 fee was included in the payoff total of $98,584.91.
As for the $28.90, you said: "We received the additional payment of $1,112.39 on 09/02/03. What was required was $1,141.29". Again, I have proof that the amount required was $1,112.39. I have a fax dated 8/29/03 from Yolanda Glass of Washington Mutual sent to the title company confirming receipt of $98,584.91 and requesting a balance due amount of $1,112.39. Where is your proof that $1,141.29 was required?
Please send a check to me in the amount of $113.90.
If your next email does not satisfy my request I will file a complaint with the Attorney General, the OBRE, www.ripoffreport.com, etc. The complaint will include how Washington Mutual miss-managed my escrow account in 2002, falsely forced flood insurance in 2003, added bogus fees to the closing/payoff amount and failed miserably at "customer service".
M
____________________________________________
From: "WaMuLoanService.com"
Reply-To: "WaMuLoanService.com"
To: M
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Escrow / Taxes / Insurance
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:52:23 -0800
Dear M,
Thank you for your inquiry about your Washington Mutual home loan.
On 09/02/03, Washington Mutual received funds in the amount of $98,584.91. $25.00 of this was immediately applied as the recording fee, leaving a remainder of $98,559.91 (the $60.00 payoff statement fee was not taken from this amount).
We received the additional payment of $1,112.39 on 09/02/03. What was required was $1,141.29 (the difference of $28.90 was advanced by Washington Mutual). We then used these funds to pay the loan in full.
When we received the refund for the insurance, the $60.00 payoff statement fee was still outstanding (as the funds were used toward payoff). The advance of $28.90 was also outstanding. We used part of the insurance refund to pay these funds, totaling $88.90. The remaining was applied as the recording fee, which I have requested to have refunded.
It is our goal to provide you with the best customer service possible.
If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding your home loan, please contact us again by email or contact our Customer Care Department toll-free at 1-866-WAMU-YES. Our home loan professionals are available to respond to you 24 hours a day, except for major holidays.
Thank You,
Tracie
eCare Specialist
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
_____________________________________
Dear Tracy,
According to YOUR RECORDS (Transaction History on the WaMu website, Fax from WaMu to the Title Company and the Washington Mutual Demand/Payoff Statement) there is no record of a $88.90 shortage.
I expect a detailed explanation of what specifically created this "shortage" and an answer to why the "shortage" does not show anywhere in your records.
Please send a check to me in the amount of $113.90.
M
_________________________________________
From: "WaMuLoanService.com"
Reply-To: "WaMuLoanService.com"
To: M
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Escrow / Taxes / Insurance
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:41:31 -0800
Dear M,
Thank you for your inquiry about your Washington Mutual home loan.
According to our records, the final payoff was still short by $88.90, even after the additional funds were received from your title company. The $60.00 that should have been applied as the payoff statement fee was used toward this shortage, along with $28.90 that was advanced by Washington Mutual.
Because the $60.00 was used toward the payoff and not the statement fee, it was still outstanding. I do see, however, that the $25.00 recording fee was paid two times in error. I have made a request to have $25.00 refunded.
It is our goal to provide you with the best customer service possible.
If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding your home loan, please contact us again by email or contact our Customer Care Department toll-free at 1-866-WAMU-YES. Our home loan professionals are available to respond to you 24 hours a day, except for major holidays. >
Thank You,
Tracie
eCare Specialist
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
____________________________________________
Dear Tracy,
The payoff amount, per the Washington Mutual Demand/Payoff Statement dated 8/20/03, was $98,584.91. This total includes:
Current total unpaid principal balance $97,956.45
Interest to 08/28/2003 at 07.500% $543.46
Payoff statement Fee $60.00
Recording Fee $25.00
My loan transaction history shows payment received of $98,559.91 and $25.00 (total $98,584.91) on 9/02/03.
On Friday, 8/29/03 Washington Mutual notified my title company by fax that a check in the amount of $98,584.91 was received; however it was short in the amount of $1,112.39. My Title company sent $1,112.39 overnight, to be delivered Tues., 9/02/03 (9/1/03 was Labor Day). My loan transaction history shows payment received of $999.99 and $112.40 (total $1,112.39) on 9/03/03.
I have documentation of the above figures.
The $60 payoff statement fee was paid 9/02/03.
The $25 recording fee was paid 9/02/03.
The shortage was paid 9/03/03.
Please send a check to me in the amount of $113.90.
Please respond.
Thank you,
M
_____________________________________
From: "WaMuLoanService.com"
Reply-To: "WaMuLoanService.com"
To: M
Subject: Re: Re: Escrow / Taxes / Insurance (KMM5028029V72129L0KM)
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:42:35 -0800
Dear M,
Thank you for your inquiry about your Washington Mutual home loan.
Following are the fees that were paid at closing from the insurance refund:
Payoff Statement Fee: $60.00
Recording Fee: $25.00
Advance: $28.90
When the loan was paid in full, the payoff amount was short by $28.90, therefor, Washington Mutual advanced the funds so that the loan could be paid in full. The other fees were a part of the final payoff. As the funds were owed to Washington Mutual, we used part of the insurance refund to cover the cost. Had we not done so, you would have received a bill in the mail for the remaining amount due.
It is our goal to provide you with the best customer service possible.
If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding your home loan, please contact us again by email or contact our Customer Care Department toll-free at 1-866-WAMU-YES. Our home loan professionals are available to respond to you 24 hours a day, except for major holidays.
Thank You,
Tracie
eCare Specialist
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
_________________________________________
Dear Tracy,
Please send me an itemized list of the "some outstanding fees" that you mentioned in your e-mail. Who authorized the use of my insurance refund to pay for your "some outstanding fees?"
Please respond.
Thanks,
M
________________________________________
From: "WaMuLoanService.com"
Reply-To: "WaMuLoanService.com"
To:
Subject: Re: Escrow / Taxes / Insurance
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:30:45 -0800
Dear M,
Thank you for your inquiry about your Washington Mutual home loan.
Our records indicate that at the time this loan was paid in full, there were some outstanding fees not covered by the payoff sent. When Washington Mutual received the insurance refund, we used a portion of it ($113.90) to cover money that was still owed to us. The remainder, $846.20, was refunded on 10/15/03.
It is our goal to provide you with the best customer service possible.
If you have any additional questions or concerns regarding your home loan, please contact us again by email or contact our Customer Care Department toll-free at 1-866-WAMU-YES. Our home loan professionals are available to respond to you 24 hours a day, except for major holidays.
Thank You,
Tracie
eCare Specialist
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
__________________________________________
Original Message Follows:
------------------------
From: M
Email: ***********@*******.com
Loan Number: **********
Application Number:
Phone Number: ***-***-****
On Sept. 12 SWBC mailed a check in the amount of $960.10 to Washington Mutual for refund of flood insurance on loan #**********. On Sept. 15 Washington Mutual received and deposited the check. This information has been verified by Amy and Jenny at SWBC and Wendy from Assurant. Check #897747737A in the amount of $846.20 dated 10/15/2003 arrived in my mailbox Oct. 20 from Washington Mutual (short $113.90). I called Washington Mutual on Oct. 21 and talked to Ann McKay she told me to call Wendy Dorrell at 843-413-2388. I spoke with Wendy on Oct. 24 and gave her all of the information listed above. Wendy said she will look into it and call me back. Wendy never called me back. Please send me the $113.90 that you owe me to my address: ***** * ********* Lane, *****, IL. I expect a response no later than 5 business days from today (2/5/04). You can reach me at work: ***-***-**** x*** or by e-mail:************@*******.com
Thank you,
M
wamu home loan, wamu home loans, WaMuHomeLoan, WaMuHomeLoan.com, WaMuHomeLoans, WaMuHomeLoans.com, washington mutual home loan, Washington Mutual Home Loans, washington mutual home mortgages, washington mutual mortgages, WashingtonMutualHomeLoan, washingtonmutualhomeloan.com, washingtonmutualhomeloans, WashingtonMutualHomeLoans.com
Recommended
No |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Highly Recommend WAMU
by studyhard, Jul 24 '03
Pros: Great service, no mistakes ever made, top notch company
Cons: fees need to be scrutinized
We bought our house in 1999. The reason we went to Washington Mutual for our mortgage was the simpl ...
Read the full review |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual - Be Careful
by nnljohnson, Feb 02 '04
Pros: NONE
Cons: taxes and insurance not paid, untrained customer service, incorrect information is the norm
I'm sorry to say that my review is not a positive one. My experiences with Washington Mutual have not been good. I was sold to Washington Mutual and they promptly ignored my taxes that were due. Then, they followed that up with not paying my home owner's insurance. While trying to clear up the first tax payment that was missed, they missed another one. Finally after phone calls, too numerous to count, letters of complaint to several agencies, both tax payments and home owner's insurance was paid. Soon after that, it was time for another tax payment. I think you see the pattern that is developing. In the two years they held my mortgage, they only paid my taxes on time once. The only reason it was paid on time was because the installment before it was paid twice! Throughout this entire time I was given incorrect or non existent fax numbers, incorrect information, and lied to about the date that an over night letter was sent out (I proved this through online tracking of the letter).
I joined a class action lawsuit, and continued to file complaints. I stayed on top of my loan and followed up with every mistake made. I refinanced and was sold back to them. Guess what ... the pattern has continued. Already, I was given a wrong fax number, information I called in was never put into my account, and customer service reps have given me conflicting information. I am now documenting my experience with Washington Mutual on the web. You can follow it here: http://nansbattle.blogspot.com/
Recommended
No
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual Home Loans
by egraeler, May 08 '03
Pros: Competitive rates. Comprehensive online account info.
Cons: Lost payments. Misapplied payments. Escrow mistakes. Moronic customer service.
The following is from my personal experience with our home loan. Recent frustration definitely played a hand in inspiration in writing this piece.
We have used WAMU since closing on our house in December 2000. We have refinanced twice to achieve better rates. Refinancing has gone smoothly, no problems there.
We did have them lose a check one time. The money came out of our account and cleared at the bank, yet the funds were never applied to our loan and they said they did not receive payment. Hmmm, well, exactly who has the money? We had to obtain a copy of the check from the bank, which showed WAMU did in fact cash the check (yet they claimed they didn't) in order to prove to them they got the payment.
In the mean time they placed some type of "flag" (which I found out two months later) on our account that disabled on-line and automatic phone access. I went round and round with them on how to get the on-line access enabled again. It took over two months of dealing with idiots and escalating the matter to a regional president to get them to finally figure out this "flag" was set on our account. The flag was set when the aforementioned payment problem occurred. Once the "flag" was turned back off everything started working again.
I refer to the customer service (via e-mail) as idiotic because I would state step-by-step how I tried to access my information online (e.g. reset password, create new account, etc.) and how the website responded. They would e-mail back and give me instructions that were what I had stated that I already tried. I finally got someone on the phone and gave him or her my necessary personal information so they could try it. I would then hear them exclaim, "hmmm, it didn't work." Well duh!!
Also note, the contact phone numbers for both customer service and loan application on their website are out of date, as they are out of service. Come on, get it together! How hard is it to update a phone number on a website?
We also deposit into an escrow to pay insurance and the taxes. Only they didn't pay the taxes. Once again much effort on my part to get the tax matter straightened out.
Smooth sailing for a while, but that didn't last. We always pay extra principle with each payment.
Tip: If you think about it, by matching your principle payment portion (small in the beginning) you are saving the (large initially) interest portion. It's like getting an extra payment in for only the cost of the principle portion. Pay even more and you can literally save 100's of 1000's of dollars.
Anyhow, on the payment stub there are spots for "Late Fees", "Future Payments", "Additional Principle" and "Additional Escrow".
Well, this last month the "Additional Principle" was applied to "Future Payments". Ugggg!!!! Why would I want to give them money early without any benefit. I had to get them to reverse the funds back out and then reapply them the correct way.
So as to avoid this problem this month, not only did I write the additional principle amount in the "Additional Principle" blank (as always) but I also highlighted it with bright green. I also wrote a note on the slip stipulating additional funds to only go to additional principle, and highlighted it in bright green as well.
You can guess what happened again, applied to future payments!! Arrggggg!!!!! >:-<
I guess I need to hold someone's hand while they apply my check! I do not want to go through this every month.
If I make a mistake they charge me a fee, well, they screwed up, again, and even when I made special provisions to prevent such an occurrence none-the-less. I think they owe me a penalty fee!!
They also informed me they have no way of tracking which employees are applying which payment tickets. Completely ridiculous, someone incompetent is probably screwing up hundreds of customers.
And if those customers are not closely monitoring how their funds are applied, they are getting ripped off big time.
Stupid Washington Mutual!!
I will have to see what happens next month. Uggg.
Follow Up
I am told that anytime extra funds are greater than a normal payment (e.g. Say payment is $800 and you submit $1700, thus extra is $900, which is more than normal payment)then those funds will be automatically applied to future payments versus additional principle, how incredibly stupid. They claim that many people like this. (Yeah, I would like that about as much as using $100 bills as tinder to start a campfire! About the same difference.) And never mind that fact that I have been sending in payments that would qualify for this condition for many months and had not had a problem till recent.
Apparently my checks and payment slips only recently started being automatically processed, which has caused the recent misapplied funds.
I am told that one possible solution is to staple my check to the payment slip to prevent the automatic system from being used. There is apparently not a way to tell the automatic system to always apply my extra funds to additional principle.
They are going to first try setting an option that will kick my payment out of the automatic system. Apparently, and they have indicated, when the automatic system is used it does not matter how you fill out the payment slip. Boy oh boy, what a great automatic system. What year is this??
It seems to have worked though. All the extra funds in my payment were correctly applied to additional principle. Sheesh!
End Follow Up
On a positive note, our loan officer (name withheld to meet policy) is awesome. She really has it together, very professional. Too bad the rest of the company doesn't work as well as she does. She has also been there, even long after closing, to help escalate resolution of these issues.
Recommended
No |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Save Yourself the Headaches
by amxmlaccnt, Jul 23 '03
Pros: None
Cons: Lost Payments, Reported Inaccurate Credit Bureau Info, Misquoted Payoff Balance, Overall Incompetence
Received a Home Equity Line of Credit from home builder's loan officer last July. Washington Mutual acquired the loan shortly after that. Since then, I have had the following problems:
- Washington Mutual changed the payment address without announcing it (twice starting in April 2003)
- When payments went to the previous address, Washington Mutual sent a collection letter claiming that the account was past due
- Customer service phone lines were jammed and it took over 30 minutes on hold to reach a representative. Representative stated that many people did not receive notice of payment address change.
- Representative also stated that a hold was placed on the account so no negative information would be reported to credit bureaus and that payments would be backdated when they were received.
-I later ordered credit bureau scores when preparing to re-finance and found they had reported the account 30 days delinquent to the bureaus even though on off-schedule payment that I sent to the new address cleared 26 days after the due date. (This is in addition to the regular payment that they lost)
- When I tried to pay off the balance and end the relationship, Washington mutual underestimated my payoff balance by approximately $2,500 so had to make a second "payoff" payment
- This has gone on for approximately 3 months now and Washington Mutual has not responded to any of my faxed requests with confirmation that the payments have been backdated or that the credit reports have been corrected.
- Customer service has proven both incompetent and apathetic.
Recommended
No |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Good, if you look over their shoulder
by fatcat1111, Mar 15 '04
Pros: Low fees, decent rates, convenient locations, good website.
Cons: Frequent errors, uneven customer service.
I've been a customer of Washington Mutual since 1999 (five years now). While they have good rates and branch availability, I frequently find mistakes in their accounting and transaction processing. Approximately every two to three months I'll find one of the following mistakes:
1. A check was cashed for an amount larger than what I wrote it for (most common, but only takes a phone call to resolve);
2. A voided transaction wasn't credited to my account (most costly, and takes about two months to resolve, after a lot of footwork);
3. The order of transactions will be rearranged so that deposits occur last, even if they went through the previous day (according the my employer, or the government, or whomever is making the deposit).
They'll tell you that all of their systems are automated, that they don't make mistakes, etc., but I have a stack of apology and balance adjustment letters to prove otherwise.
Most of the time these can be resolved easily, especially if you call during bank hours, when the help is friendly. If you call during non-bank hours you get some other group of people (outsourced?) that seem rude, uncaring, and unable to do anything.
So, if you're comfortable tracking every transaction and working through customer service, you'll save money going with Washington Mutual. If you expect the bank to do everything correctly the first time, it will really cost you.
Recommended
Yes |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Avoid Washington Mutual When in A Hurry or Refinancing
by tanstaafm, Jun 10 '03
Pros: Low, Competitive Mortgage/refinancing Rates
Cons: Frustratingly poor customer service, extremely slow processing
I originally approached Washington Mutual for the refinancing of our home about two months ago. I came to the initial meeting with the loan representative well-prepared in terms of supporting documentation and with strong credit scores. Once we'd completed about 90 minutes' worth of paperwork, we were able to receive an approval and lock a rate. So far so good. The loan representative said that a forty-five day lock should be adequate, and that the loan should close within two to three weeks.
At this point, the loan person confided in me that all loans are reviewed and loan documentation checked by an overworked and difficult individual at their regional headquarters, and that he would do everything possible to move things along. A week later he informed me that the person who checked the paperwork would be going on vacation, and that he still hadn't managed to get her to review my loan. Another week passed. The loan representative unofficially gave me her phone number so that I could get my real estate attorney to touch bases with the "paperwork person" and try to move things along. Her reply to my attorney was that their computers were having trouble, and that they had been unable to process any more applications, and that when the computers did come up (by the way, on later inquiry, the loan representative claimed that their computers were down for a whole week), new home loans would take preference over refinancing requests, regardless of application date. Another three weeks went by. For the following several weeks, most calls and e-mail messages (abotu 80% of the time or more) went unanswered. When I finally sent a letter to my loan representative, his boss, and the person who was processing the paperwork, I finally got a call indicating that the loan would close "next week", but that the initial lock had expired on the loan, and that they would have to relock it, HOWEVER, as this was a relock and I was no longer a "new customer", they couldn't offer me their lowest "new customer" rate. Since rates had fallen in the meantime, I still locked at an eighth of a point lower, but I would have locked at a quarter lower otherwise. That was two weeks ago. I tried to call several times last week, and got no reply at all from anyone. My real estate attorney has left several messages about completing the close, and has also gotten no replies.
At all points we've just asked the bank to let us know what they needed to finish the process, and they STILL can't manage to call us back and set a close. As of right now, I'm ready to lose the $300 application fee and just go with someone else; it's a good thing I wasn't in a hurry for the money. This is a reminder that absurdly inefficient beaurocracies with horrible service occasionally manage to exist in the private sector, too; it's just amazing that they haven't gone belly-up yet.
Recommended
No |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Good for free checking, Go elsewhere for any loan.
by sheturbo, Feb 14 '03
Pros: Free checking, friendly tellers
Cons: Excruciatingly tough to get any kind of loan unless you have glowing, sparkling credit.
I have been banking with WAMU for eight years. WAMU has been great for free checking, and has friendly tellers. The hours of their drive-up window is slightly inconvenient if you work odd hours. Their web site isn't too bad, it is fairly easy to navigate, but easy to get lost in if you don't have the links memorized on where you want to go.
I have had three occasions where they had misplaced my manual deposits and then bounced my checks. Even though I had proof of their error and they eventually fixed the problem, I asked them to take the NSF dings against my bank credit off the record, and they said they wouldn't, even though it was their fault.
I had gone in to get a VA loan, and found them to be overly tough on their requirements, though I realize some of the guidelines by the VA are to blame. However, I was only approved for 100k for which they knew I couldn't find anything in that price range for what I needed. I went to a different institution, and was approved for $170k. WAMU wouldn't give me the time of day for a conventional loan... One other occasion after that horriffic experience, I had gone in to ask for an open line of credit or signature loan for only $5k. After banking with them for so long and being in the military, you'd think it would be a breeze. No way. I was declined because they didn't understand what I wanted the money for, despite my explanation and paperwork outlining the low risk.
I no longer try to use that bank for any kind of loan - only for my bill-paying and general banking... for now. I am looking for another bank.
Recommended
No |
| Express Reviews |
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
HORRIBLE CUSTOMER SERVICE
by dobsonsd,Oct 01 '03
Pros: Not a single pro.
Cons: Horrible customer service. Do not live up to promises.
I applied online for a home equity loan because the web site said that I would either receive an instant answer or one within 2 days. It has now been six weeks and I have not received an answer. Not only did they not live up to their promise, but their customer service representatives will not return voice mail messages. I have left messages asking the status of my application for the last five weeks, and none of my calls have been returned!
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Washington Mutual Den of Thieves
by krradfordjr,Oct 28 '03
Pros: The convenience of having a bank on every corner.
Cons: Paying for the convenience.
Thieves are the best way to describe a bank that charges over $10.00 an hour to use the their overdraft protection. I made the mistake of not having money enough in my account. Washington Mutual made the note of that and paid bills from my set bill pay days earlier than usual. The early payment of those bills put me at a deficit which was put on my account at midnight on 10-28-03. I arrived at the bank for their opening on 10-29-03 the most early that anything could be done to protect the account. So between midnight, with a positive balance and their doors opening, and their posting my bill pay early, it cost me $60.00 in overdraft fees. If their software to moderate their accounts is designed to create review, I don't know, but the choice to post my bill pay early was a great blow to my feeling about my relationship with Washington Mutual.
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Nothing but headaches
by legalmtion,Nov 28 '03
Pros: None in my case
Cons: customer service people give different answers, payments not credited though checks are cashed
I have a home equity loan that was bought out by Washington Mutual. I also use online billpay through my bank. Several months ago, I noticed that Washington Mutual was not crediting my payments in a timely manner. As I started checking into it, I found that they were cashing my checks but not not crediting some of them. Some would be credited within about a week, some up to a month, some not at all. After many, many phone calls to try to straighten this out (phone calls I might add during limited customer service hours which make it difficult to even make the calls since I work during the day), I am still waiting. A month ago, I faxed them the back and front copies of my online billpay checks that I got from my bank and they have still not credited my account. They took the money and I have proved it, but they have to "investigate" it. Additionally, they have hit my credit report with late payments. This is NOT a bank I want to do any business with.
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Avoid like the plague
by ameetnaik,Jan 13 '04
Pros: Rates???
Cons: Everything else
I had the most horrible experience refinancing a mortgage through them. It's been 6 months since I first applied. After almost a 100 phone calls, as many voice mails, lots of buck-passing, I finally got a closing date in Dec. When the notary showed up, I found out they were charging me PMI. After several more phone calls they fixed that part.
It's January now and my prior 2nd mortgage is still not paid off - more buck passing by their settlement agents (LandAmerica).
Avoid their direct (Internet/telephone) lending service like the plague. My last mortgage was through a broker, and a real lawyer handled the settlement. I probably ended up paying a little more but looking back, it was definitely worth the peace of mind.
|
| Product Rating: |
 |
| Customer Service: |
 |
| Web Site Experience: |
 |
| Web Site Load Time: |
 |
|
Incompetent Loan Closer
by punt,Dec 04 '03
Pros: Other than low mortgage rates, can't think of any.
Cons: Poor customer service when closing a CD upon death of my father-in-law (1 1/2 hours)
To obtain a longer term/lower rate mortgage, I refinanced my mortgage through an established broker in the Seattle area who placed the loan package with WAMU. We closed in late June, 2003. I received an Escrow Account Statement dated August 18, 2003 (50 days after closing)advising me that an escrow shortage of $421.02 existed and as such my payment would increase to cover that amount.
Having spent over 25 years in the mortgage banking business, it became apparent to me that WAMU has at least one incompetent loan closer who is unable to prorate escrows. I find it inexcusible especially since my real estate taxes and hazard insurance premiums were known in the processing stage of the loan process.
Was this just plain incompetence?
|
|
|
| |